Why The Bible Is Not A Good Historical/scientific Source

General and Offtopic Conversations. The forum to discuss world news, music, generic movies, politics, social issues and sport, everything that is not related to vegetarianism goes here.

Re: Why the bible is not a good historical/scientific source

Postby AndyBa » Oct 8, 2010 10:36 pm

I would like to adjust the title to: "bible is not a historical/scientific source at all." :)
It is not even science fiction it is simply fiction.

I kind of moved my bias from being agnostic to being atheist in the last 3 years.
Andy`Ba

The human body has no more need for cows' milk than it does for dogs' milk, horses' milk, or giraffes' milk. ~Michael Klaper, M.D., author of Vegan Nutrition: Pure & Simple
User avatar
AndyBa
Vegan Zealot
 
Posts: 842
Joined: May 27, 2001 12:00 am

Re: Why the bible is not a good historical/scientific source

Postby BigBecka » Oct 18, 2010 1:54 pm

How interesting :) what caused this change in bias? ;-p

(Here, everyone seems to be becoming more Christian! :lol: )

Well, I am sure there was a guy called Jesus... Probably a few!
BigBecka
Lord of the posts
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Dec 2, 2006 7:53 pm

Previous

Return to General Conversations