Apocalyptica wrote:There are always going to be arrogant people, regardless of what group they belong to. So of course there will be arrogant vegans who preach to thier friends, and arrogant meat eaters who join vegan forums in order to start arguments and tell others how superior their viewpoint is.
My argument, although not explicily stated, was that there is correlation and perhaps some causation between whether or not someone is a vegan and whether or not someone is arrogant. Saying that there are arrogant people everwhere is a cop out, you're right of course, but I thought it was obvious that I was saying that vegans are more arrogant as a group than the norm.
As for your thinly guised barb about "meat eaters" (which by the way is an inadequate way of describing a regular humans diet) having the gall to join your forum and get this!: Disagree with you on some matters; there is nothing arrogant about disagreeing with someone if you justify your position properly. What is arrogant is presuming that someone starting an argument with you is somehow taboo.
Apocalyptica wrote: It is interesting that we would call vegans elitist because they challenge the elitist worldview that human beings are superior to such an extent that we should be free to use animals for any purpose we desire, regardless of whether that use provides a needed benefit for us.
The current worldview is not that we are "free to use animals for any purpose we desire", that's why there is such a thing as
animal rights. On top of that, although the current worldview pertaining to non human animals may be elitist, but at least it is justified.
Apocalyptica wrote: I wouldn't say that most meat eaters lack compassion or empathy though; many of them are not aware of the unnecessary suffering that goes into their consumption habits,
So if ignorance on the issue means you keep your status as a compassionate being, would you consider educating them a cruel thing to do because essentially you are condemning them to either subscribe to a different way of life or to forever be labelled incompassionate.
Apocalyptica wrote: and if they are aware they are simply protecting their own ego and/or their circle of compassion does not extend to non-human animals.
How is taking advantage of an efficient, societally acceptable, naturally eaten and damned tasty form of food protecting ones ego? For normal people animals still recieve some compassion but we are realistic in saying that animals shouldn't recieve the same amount of compassion that human animals do and as a result of this gobbling them up is ok.
Apocalyptica wrote: If they are not compassionate to animals then I do view them differently and feel that our personalities are not compatable, but that is not because I'm a vegan; I've been that way my whole life. I don't want to be friends with someone who thinks it funny or okay to abuse an animal.
So, because of your lifestyle choice you are intentionally excluding yourself from accepting other people for who they are? Right.
I don't think the vast majority of normal eaters "think it funny or okay to abuse and animal", killing and eating an animal is not animal abuse (when done properly under industry standards), and I doubt anyone but psychos think animals being eaten is "funny".
Apocalyptica wrote:And the only reason omnis would not like being around me is because of the knowledge that I'm a vegan - this has happened to me often, where people judge me as soon as they hear I'm a vegan, and go on the offense wanting to pick a fight with me.
Although this is purely anecdotal so holds little weight in this discussion, it doesn't seem to match up with what you said above. Earlier you "view them differently and feel that our personalities are not compatable" referring to normal eaters, perhaps your outright bias against them is influencing the situation a bit here.
Apocalyptica wrote: I don't inconvenience anyone - I bring my own food to other peoples houses when necessary,
Bringing your own food is considered rude in most Western countries as the implication is that you don't feel that the hosts food is satisfactory. Regardless of whether or not you mean it that way (and you do, you think their food is morally wrong) it does give off that feeling, that sounds like inconvinience to me.
Apocalyptica wrote: and my questions for a waiter in a restaurant are limited to 'is there any cheese in the bruschetta', or something like that. I never ask that the chef make me a special meal, and have never known another vegan to do that either.
What if there is cheese in the bruschetta? Do you ask the chef to make a meal different than usual specially for you or do you sit there and take up a seat that another proper paying customer could be in? More inconvinience.